UNITED STATES EX REL. CLARK
v.
HEINZE, WARDEN, ET AL.

U.S. | 1956-05-21
No. 613
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
351 U.S. 942 Supreme Court of the United States (1956) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Reck v. Pate, 367 U.S. 433 (U.S. 1961)
    …had not been violated at Reek’s trial. Reck v. People, 7 Ill. 2d 261, 130 N. E. 2d 200. This Court denied certiorari “without prejudice to an application for a writ of habeas corpus in an appropriate United States District Court.” Reck v. Illinois, 351 U. S. 942. Reck then filed a petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The writ issued, and at the hearing the District Court received in evidence the transcripts of all relevant proceedings in the…
    1 / 2
  • United States ex rel. Louis Cuomo v. FAY, 257 F.2d 438 (2d Cir. 1958)
    …pauperis. On January 9, 1956, the Appellate Division denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on a typed record and typed brief. The relator then petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari but the application was denied on May 21, 1956, 351 U.S. 942, 76 S.Ct. 841, 100 L.Ed. 1468. A few days later the State of New York moved in the Appellate Division to dismiss the relator’s appeal. This motion was denied on condition that the relator perfect his appeal in the normal course in time to be heard…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw