NAUMO
v.
NEW YORK
NAUMO
NEW YORK
351 U.S. 944
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department.
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ferguson v. Thomas, 430 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1970)…of the state as an employer in promoting the efficiency of the public service it performs through its employees. Pickering v. Bd. of Education, supra; and Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551, 76 S. Ct. 637, 100 L.Ed. 692, reh. den. 351 U.S. 944, 76 S.Ct. 843, 100 L.Ed. 1470 (1956). See also Scoville v. Board of Education, 425 F. 2d 10 (7th Cir. En Banc, 1970). Here the proof before the district court showed that Dr. Ferguson exercised his rights of speech and association to such an ext…
-
In re Kave, 760 F.2d 343 (1st Cir. 1985)…37 S.Ct. 621, 61 L.Ed. 1198 (1917); Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Comm’n of Investigation, 406 U.S. 472, 92 S.Ct. 1670, 32 L.Ed.2d 234 (1972). Cf. Slochower v. [*355] Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551, 76 S.Ct. 637, 100 L.Ed. 692 reh’g denied, 351 U.S. 944, 76 S.Ct. 843, 100 L.Ed. 1470 (1956). Nonetheless, to sustain the privilege, it need only be evident that a responsive answer to the question, or an explanation of why it cannot be answered, is potentially incriminating. Hoffman v. United States, su…
-
Honore v. Douglas, 833 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1987)…judicial restraint, however, does not require slavish deference to a university’s arbitrary deprivation of a vested property right. Slochower v. Board of Education of New York, 350 U.S. 551, 76 S.Ct. 637, 100 L.Ed. 692, modified on denial of reh’g, 351 U.S. 944, 76 S.Ct. 843, 100 L.Ed. 1470 (1956); Brown v. Texas A & M University, 804 F. 2d 327 (5th Cir.1986); United States v. Lulac, 793 F. 2d 636 (5th Cir.1986); Zeigler v. Jackson, 638 F. 2d 776 (5th Cir.1981); Green v. Board of Regents of Texas Tech Univ…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence