MILLS

v.

KEARNEY, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Rogers v. Schering Corp., 262 F.2d 180 (3d Cir. 1959)
  …imed for rescission of the agreement. On July 8, 1955 the district court gave judgment for the plaintiff. Brownell v. Schering Corp., D. C., 129 F.Supp. 879. The judgment was affirmed by this court on appeal. 3 Cir., 228 F. 2d 624, certiorari denied 351 U.S. 954, 76 S.Ct. 849, 100 L.Ed. 1477. On July 6, 1956 Hexagon applied to Schering for a license under Schering’s Patent No. 2,567,245 to manufacture and sell an anti-histamine known as chlor-prophenpyradimine maléate. The parties were unable to agree on t…
• Airport Comm'n OF Forsyth Cnty. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 300 F.2d 185 (4th Cir. 1962)
  …that the Board express its concurrence. It was intended as a general statement of policy to guide the public in future planning. Brownell v. Schering Corporation, 129 F.Supp. 879, 905 (D.C.N.J. 1955), Aff’d. 228 F. 2d 624, (3 Cir., 1956), Cert. den. 351 U.S. 954, 76 S.Ct. 849, 100 L.Ed. 1477. Even if we should assume that the pronouncement required publication we cannot see that the failure to do so has injured the petitioners. The only penalty under Section 3 of the Administrative Act lies in the eliminat…