ALVAREZ
v.
NEW YORK
ALVAREZ
NEW YORK
351 U.S. 955
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Lynch v. Household Fin. Corp., 405 U.S. 538 (U.S. 1972)…ishing Co. v. Lauer, 268 F. 2d 187 (CA5), cert. denied, 361 U. S. 913 (1959); Furnish v. Board of Medical Examiners of California, 257 F. 2d 520 (CA9), cert. denied, 358 U. S. 882 (1958); Norwood v. Parenteau, 228 F. 2d 148 (CA8 1955), cert. denied, 351 U. S. 955 (1956).1 The Court also suggests that § 2283 is inapplicable here because no Connecticut court authorized the garnishment. Its view apparently is that a federal injunction would therefore not interfere with state court processes. Until now, however…
-
Mirra v. United States, 379 F.2d 782 (2d Cir. 1967)…counsel by Mirra had he not been, as he claims, in “a fog.” Compare Kyle v. United States, 266 F. 2d 670, 672 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 361 U.S. 870, 80 S.Ct. 131, 4 L.Ed.2d 109 (1959); Sanders v. United States, 230 F. 2d 127 (4th Cir.), cert. denied 351 U.S. 955, 76 S.Ct. 852, 100 L.Ed. 1478 (1956); United States v. Walker, 197 F. 2d 287 (2d Cir. 1952). On a § 2255 motion, the judge must determine whether a hearing is required. Here the judge had available the record of the trial and of his own observation…
-
Alastair Kyle v. United States, 266 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1959)…r., 1952, 197 F. 2d 287, 288; United States v. Rosenberg, supra. The section “may not be used to retry the case or to raise questions which might have been raised upon appeal.” Sanders v. United States, 4 Cir., 1956, 230 F. 2d 127, certiorari denied 351 U.S. 955, 76 S.Ct. 852, 100 L.Ed. 1478. Use of false testimony of the witness Messig: The appellant claims a denial of due process from the allegedly false testimony of one Meesig, who was a United States Postal Inspector. Cf. Smith v. United States, 5 Cir…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence