INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O., ET AL.
v.
ANDERSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, ET AL.
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O., ET AL.
ANDERSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, ET AL.
351 U.S. 959
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, ante, p. 266, decided this day.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. E. M. "Mike" Riebold and Donald T. Morgan, 557 F.2d 697 (10th Cir. 1977)…se and limited significance, is within the discretion accorded the Trial Court in order that it may guide and assist the jury in understanding and judging the factual controversy. Shane v. Warner Mfg. Corp., 229 F. 2d 207 (3rd Cir. 1956), dismissed, 351 U.S. 959, 76 S.Ct. 860, 100 L.Ed. 1481 (1956); Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331, 135 A. 2d 395, 68 A.L.R.2d 761; 5B C.J.S. Appeal and Error § 1782, 89 C.J.S. Trial § 467. 496 F. 2d, at 321. Applying these standards to the circumstances of this case, we hold t…
-
Fed. Aviation Admin. & United States v. Landy, 705 F.2d 624 (2d Cir. 1983)…cert. denied, 435 U.S. 952, 98 S.Ct. 1580, 55 L.Ed.2d 802 (1978) and Shane v. Warner Manufacturing Corp., 229 F. 2d 207, 209-10 (3d Cir.) (court permissibly gave jury written computation of damages prepared by plaintiff’s counsel), appeal dismissed, 351 U.S. 959, 76 S.Ct. 860, 100 L.Ed. 1481 (1956); with United States v. Adams, 385 F. 2d 548, 550-51 (2d Cir.1967) (court impermissibly gave jury incriminating writings by government agent which had not been received in evidence). B. The Log Book. Appellants r…
-
Elisabeth M. Byrne v. Matczak, 254 F.2d 525 (3d Cir. 1958)…372, 388-396, 63 S.Ct. 1077, 87 L.Ed. 1458. In this view, fair new procedures, which tend to facilitate proper fact finding, are allowable, although not traditional. See Shane v. Warner Mfg. Corp., 3 Cir., 1956, 229 F. 2d 207, certiorari dismissed 351 U.S. 959, 76 S.Ct. 860, 100 L.Ed. 1481; Waldrip v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., D.C.W.D.La.1951, 11 F.R.D. 426, where, after proper instructions, juries were allowed to take into the deliberation room calculations made by counsel, although not introduced into evid…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence