SWORD LINE, INC.,
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1956-06-11
No. 861
351 U.S. 976 Supreme Court of the United States (1956) Negative Treatment
Cited by 54 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Per Curiam:

Cer-tiorari is granted, limited to the question whether admiralty had jurisdiction over the controversy stated in the libel, and the judgment is affirmed. The libel, though dependent on a statute, alleges unjust enrichment from a maritime contract. Archawski v. Hanioti, 350 U. S. 532. Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

  • Curcio v. United States, 354 U.S. 118 (U.S. 1957)
    …asked, that a [*122] responsive answer to the question or an explanation of why it cannot be answered might be dangerous because injurious disclosure could result.” Hoffman v. United States, 341 U. S. 479, 486-487. See also, Trock v. United States, 351 U. S. 976; Emspak v. United States, 349 U. S. 190; Singleton v. United States, 343 U. S. 944; Greenberg v. United States, 343 U. S. 918. Pulford v. United States, 155 F. 2d 944, 947; Lumber Products Assn. v. United States, 144 F. 2d 546, 553; Carolene Produc…
  • Brown v. United States, 359 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1959)
    …2d 837 (five-month sentence), cert, dismissed as moot 319 U. S. 41. The following cases in the Second Circuit definitely adopted the procedure here in question: United States v. Trock, 232 F. 2d 839 (four-month sentence with purge clause), reversed 351 U. S. 976; United States v. Curdo, 234 F. 2d 470 (six-month sentence with purge clause) reversed 354 U. S. 118; United States v. Gordon, 236 F. 2d 916 (six-month sentence containing a purge clause reversed); United States v. Courtney, 236 F. 2d 921 (three-mon…
  • United States v. United Cont'l Tuna Corp., 425 U.S. 164 (U.S. 1976)
    …5 (SDNY 1954), rev’d, 220 F. 2d 655 (CA2 1955); Smith-Johnson S. S. Corp. v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 869, 139 F. Supp. 298, cert. denied, 351 U. S. 988 (1956), with Sword Line v. United States, 228 F. 2d 344 (CA2 1955), 230 F. 2d 75 (CA2), aff’d, 351 U. S. 976 (1956) (after Sword Line was affirmed, the Court of Claims reversed itself in Smith-Johnson, supra, in 135 Ct. Cl. 866, 142 F. Supp. 367 (1956)). The House had passed an identical bill in 1958, H. R. 3046, 85th Cong., 1st Sess., but it did not emer…

Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw