UNITED STATES

v.

HOWARD, TRADING AS STOKES FISH CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Shotwell Mfg. Co., 355 U.S. 233 (U.S. 1957)
  …petition and cross-petitions for certiorari for some months on the basis of representations made by the Solicitor General in his letters of December 6, 1955, and June 1, 1956, which culminated in the filing of the Government’s motion to remand. See 351 U. S. 980. As originally filed, the cross-petition was conditional on the Government’s petition being granted. After the Government moved to remand, respondents withdrew the conditional limitation, and Huebner withdrew his cross-petition in its entirety. Hue…
• Carlisle v. United States, 517 U.S. 416 (U.S. 1996)
  …e evenhanded administration of justice outweighs the interest in finality and granted such petitions even though untimely [*451] and even though there is not a word in our Rules that authorized such action. Thus, in United States v. Ohio Power Co., 351 U. S. 980 (1956), the Court on its own initiative vacated an earlier order denying a petition for rehearing and, in the following Term, granted the previously denied petition. United States v. Ohio Power Co., 353 U. S. 98 (1957). While Justice Harlan dissente…
• United States v. Howard, 352 U.S. 212 (U.S. 1957)
  …ations do not constitute the “law of” Florida within the meaning of the Black Bass Act and on ap-pellee’s motion quashed the information. An appeal was brought here by the United States pursuant to 18 U. S. C. § 3731. We noted probable jurisdiction. 351 U. S. 980. Florida’s Game Commission was created by a 1942 constitutional amendment (Art. IV, § 30, Constitution of Florida) which provides that: “after January 1, 1943, the management, restoration, conservation, and regulation, of the . . . fresh-water fis…