GARLINGTON ET AL.
v.
WASSON ET AL.

U.S. | 1956-10-08
No. 115
352 U.S. 806 Supreme Court of the United States (1956) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.*

*

[This order amended, post, p. 979.]


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gen. Motors Corp. v. Washington, 377 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1964)
    …y that appellant has shown that its activities within the State are not such incidents as the State can reach. Norton Co. v. Department of Revenue, supra, at 537. Unlike Field Enterprises, Inc., v. Washington, 47 Wash. 2d 852, 289 P. 2d 1010, aff'd, 352 U. S. 806 (1956), citing Norton, supra, the Pontiac and Oldsmobile Divisions of General Motors had no branch offices in Washington. But these divisions had district managers, service representatives and other employees who were residents of the State and who…
  • Garlington v. Wasson, 352 U.S. 979 (U.S. 1957)
    …The motion to treat the appeal papers as a petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order entered in this case on October 8, 1956, 352 U. S. 806, is amended to read as follows: “Per Curiam: The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.” Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the c…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw