AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.
352 U.S. 816
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Turley, 352 U.S. 407 (U.S. 1957)…within the meaning of the Act. The Government appealed directly [*410] to this Court under 18 U. S. C. § 3731 because the dismissal was based upon a construction of the statute upon which the information was founded. We noted probable jurisdiction. 352 U. S. 816. Decisions involving the meaning of “stolen” as used in the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act did not arise frequently until comparatively recently. Two of the earlier cases interpreted “stolen” as meaning statutory larceny as defined by the State i…
-
Alleghany Corp. v. Breswick & Co., 353 U.S. 151 (U.S. 1957)
-
Am. Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. United States, 355 U.S. 141 (U.S. 1957)…cate without such restrictions. 144 F. Supp. 365. We agree with the conclusion of the District Court that under the circumstances of this case the action of the Commission was well founded. At the time we noted probable jurisdiction of the appeals, 352 U. S. 816 (1956), counsel in No. 8 were invited to discuss the issue of appellants’ standing to sue. None of the parties now question that standing, and our examination of § 17 (11)3 and § 205 (h)4 of the Act leads us to conclude that appellants may properly…