S. C. JOHNSON & SON, INC.,

v.

GOLD SEAL CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Maryland v. Louisiana, 451 U.S. 725 (U.S. 1981)
  …the state shall be an indispensable party in interest.” See Mobil Oil Corp. v. FPC, 157 U. S. App. D. C. 235, 238-240, 483 F. 2d 1238, 1241-1243 (1973); Detroit v. FPC, 97 U. S. App. D. C. 260, 269-271, 230 F. 2d 810, 819-821 (1955), cert. denied, 352 U. S. 829 (1956) ; Union Oil Company of California, Docket No. CI77-828 et ah, p. 11 (FERC, Apr. 12, 1978); Canadian Superior Oil (U. S.) Ltd., Docket No. CI77-802 et al, p. 4 (FERC, Mar. 28, 1978); Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 38 F. P. C. 691, 698 (1967); Con…
• City OF Chicago v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 458 F.2d 731 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …either by the Natural Gas Act or by the Constitution.77 Rather, the argument is that the decision of this court in City of Detroit v. P.P.C., 97 U.S.App.D.C. 260, 230 F. 2d 810 (1955), cert. denied, Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co. v. City of Detroit, 352 U.S. 829, 77 S.Ct. 34,1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956), places a heavy burden on the Commission to justify its departure from individual cost-of-service regulation, a burden which it has not met in this case.78 In the City of Detroit case, this court reviewed an order i…
• Kohn v. Am. Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir. 1972)
  …S.Ct. 317, 84 L.Ed. 329 (1940), or whether they subsequently allege that the officers and directors of the corporation had formulated and obtained approval of a fraudulent reorganization plan. Nichols v. Alker, 231 F. 2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 829, 77 S.Ct. 42, 1 L.Ed.2d 51 (1956). In King v. Realty Mortgage Co., 107 F. 2d 90 (5th Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 673, 60 S.Ct. 712, 84 L.Ed. 1018 (1940), it was held that a preferred shareholder who was notified of each step in a receivership…