DWOSKIN, ALIAS DEE,

v.

NEBRASKA

Citator

Cited By

• Reed v. Honorable W. B. Franke, 297 F.2d 17 (4th Cir. 1961)
  …rt cited three cases to support its holding that it had no ju [*21] risdiction: Michaelson v. Herren, 242 F. 2d 693 (2d Cir. 1957); Berstein v. Herren, 141 F.Supp. 78 (S.D.N.Y.), affirmed on other grounds, 234 F. 2d 434 (2d Cir.), certiorari denied, 352 U.S. 840, 77 S.Ct. 60, 1 L.Ed.2d 57 (1956); and Bolger v. Marshall, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 30, 193 F. 2d 37 (D.C.Cir.1951). None of these cases involves a substantial constitutional claim3 and each is thus distinguishable from the instant case. It is true that dict…
• Martin-Marietta Corp. v. The United States, 373 F.2d 972 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …o., supra, 383 U.S. at 36, 86 S.Ct. 684. When the claimed invention is obvious in light of the prior art, these other facts may not make the patent valid. See Gentzel v. Manning, Maxwell & Moore, 230 F. 2d 341, 343-344 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 840, 77 S.Ct. 63, 1 L.Ed.2d 57 (1956). One further contention by plaintiff has been considered. In 1950 and 1951, the Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Navy issued notices to plaintiff and its licensees pursuant to the Royalty Adjus…
• AMP Inc. v. FOY, 540 F.2d 1181 (4th Cir. 1976)
  …not an essential element in establishing a likelihood to confuse, it is substantial evidence thereof. HMH Publishing Co., at 717-719; Tisch Hotels at 612; see Dwight S. Williams v. Lykens Hosiery Mills, 233 F. 2d 398, 401 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. den. 352 U.S. 840, 77 S.Ct. 61, 1 L.Ed.2d 56 (1956). An important similarity between this case and Communications Satellite Corp. v. Comcet is shown by the following quotation from 429 F. 2d 1245, 1251.12 “Finally, we reiterate that Comsat coined its name first; Co…