MICHIGAN NATIONAL BANK

v.

GIDNEY, COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY

Citator

Cited By

• Eduard VON DER Heydt v. Rogers, 251 F.2d 17 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
  …its order, for production of documents, issued under Rule 34, in the absence of evidence and of finding that petitioner “refuses to obey” such order. . District of Columbia v. Fadeley, 1956, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 176, 233 F. 2d 667, 670, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 847, 77 S.Ct. 64, 1 L.Ed.2d 57. . Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Coe, 1941, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 131, 132, 125 F. 2d 198, 199, citing Shellman v. Shellman, 1938, 68 App.D.C. 197, 198, 95 F. 2d 108; Societe Suisse, etc., v. Cummings, 1938, 69 App.D.C. 154, 1…
• Camden Tr. Co. v. Gidney, 301 F.2d 521 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
  …si; * JJ . National Bank of Detroit v. Wayne Oakland Bank, 252 F. 2d 537 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 830, 79 S.Ct. 50, 3 L.Ed.2d 69 (1958); Michigan National Bank, Lansing, Michigan v. Gidney, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 134, 237 F. 2d 762, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 847, 77 S.Ct. 55, 1 L.Ed.2d 54 (1956); First National Bank in St. Louis v. Missouri, 263 U.S. 640, 658, 659, 44 S.Ct. 213, 68 L.Ed. 486 (1924); cf. Franklin Nat. Bank of Franklin Square v. New York, 347 U.S. 373, 378 n. 7, 74 S.Ct. 550, 98 L.Ed. 767 (19…
• Alloys & Chems. Corp. v. The United States, 324 F.2d 509 (Ct. Cl. 1963)
  …igated to pay notwithstanding the substantial variance. Lipshitz & Cohen v. United States, supra; Mottram v. United States, 271 U.S. 15, 46 S.Ct. 386, 70 L.Ed. 803 (1926); Furman v. United States, 140 F.Supp. 781, 135 Ct.Cl. 202 (1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 847, 77 S.Ct. 65, 1 L.Ed. 2d 58. It is clearly so where, as here, this proposition of law is less rigorously tried by the equities because plaintiff, having bid on a price per pound basis, is obligated to pay for no more than the quantity actually deliv…