UNITED STATES ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA EASTERN LINE, INC.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 451 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …erhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 1952, 343 U.S. 768, 772-775, 72 S.Ct. 1022, 96 L.Ed. 1283; Richardson v. Texas & New Orleans R.R., 5 Cir. 1957, 242 F. 2d 230, 234-236; Central of Georgia Ry. v. Jones, 5 Cir. 1956, 229 F. 2d 648, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 848, 77 S.Ct. 32, 1 L.Ed.2d 59. Under the National Labor Relations Act, they have exercised an identical power. See Syres v. Oil Workers Local 23, 1955, 350 U.S. 892, 76 S.Ct. 152, 100 L.Ed. 785, rev’g, 5 Cir., 223 F. 2d 739; Local Union No. 12, United…
• Sanderson v. Ford Motor Co., 483 F.2d 102 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …ues, and not from the date of the act causing the injury or damage.” Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineermen v. Hammett, 1962, 273 Ala. 397, 140 So. 2d 832; accord Central Georgia Railway v. Jones, 5th Cir. 1956, 229 F. 2d 648, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 848, 77 S.Ct. 32, 1 L.Ed.2d 59. In this case the limitation period began to run on October 20, 1969, the date of Sanderson’s seniority lay-off, less than one year before suit was filed on [*115] October 13, 1970. Thus, the statute of limitations will no…
• Boeing Airplane Co. v. Coggeshall, 280 F.2d 654 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
  …(if not solely) within the jurisdiction of the Tax Court. Cf. Macauley v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 1946, 327 U.S. 540, 66 S.Ct. 712, 90 L.Ed. 839; United States v. California Eastern Line, Inc., 98 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 231 F. 2d 754, certiorari denied, 1956, 352 U.S. 848, 77 S.Ct. 35, 1 L.Ed.2d 59. Insofar as the Board suggests that the subpoenaed documents are irrelevant, we must disagree.6 Nonetheless, when a party objects to the enforcement of a subpoena, enforcement depends preliminarily on a showing of good ca…