JACKSON

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Benefield v. State, 160 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1964)
  …fornia judicial exceptions to their statute merely represents the recognition of certain established exceptions to the common law rule. As the California court pointed out in the case of People v. Maddox, 1956, 46 Cal.2d 301, 294 P. 2d 6, cert. den. 352 U.S. 858, 77 S.Ct. 81, 1 L.Ed.2d 65: “It must be borne in mind that the primary purpose of the constitutional guarantees is to prevent unreasonable invasions of the security of the people in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, and when an officer ha…
• Conti v. State, 540 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …1) (mere failure of an officer to expressly inform of cause of arrest will not render arrest illegal where a person arrested knew officer and knew he was acting in official capacity); People v. Maddox, 46 Cal.2d 301, 294 P. 2d 6 (1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 858, 77 S.Ct. 81, 1 L.Ed.2d 65 (1956) (failure to inform of cause of arrest is unrelated and collateral to the securing of evidence incident to the arrest). In this case, appellant was informed that there was a warrant outstanding for his arrest, and t…
• Wilson v. State, 673 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …trance and stated his purpose_ Without the benefit of hindsight and ordinarily on the spur of the moment, the officer must decide these questions in the first instance. Id. (quoting People v. Maddox, 46 Cal.2d 301, 294 P. 2d 6 (1956), cert, denied, 352 U.S. 858, 77 S.Ct. 81, 1 L.Ed.2d 65 (1956) (citations and notes omitted). Thus, Benefield adopts the common law exceptions justifying an unannounced entry, holding: [O]ur statute is violated by an 'unannounced intrusion in the form of a breaking and enterin…