THOMAS
v.
THOMAS
THOMAS
THOMAS
352 U.S. 873
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)…nts, 484 F. 2d 928, 930 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 991, 94 S.Ct. 1591, 39 L.Ed.2d 888 (1974); United States v. Bryant, 480 F. 2d 785, 790 (2d Cir. 1973); Monroe v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 234, 234 F. 2d 49, 55, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873, 77 S.Ct. 94, 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956). The decision in this case to admit the tapes, leaving to the jury the question of their weight, falls far short of an abuse of that discretion. C. Admissibility of Particular Excerpts Mitchell objects on two diff…
-
United States v. Knohl, 379 F.2d 427 (2d Cir. 1967)…ing or inaudible does not render it inadmissible. See, Addison v. United States, 317 F. 2d 808, 815 (5 Cir. 1963); United States v. Schanerman, 150 F. 2d 941 (3 Cir. 1945); Monroe v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 234 F. 2d 49, 55, cert. denied 352 U.S. 873, 77 S.Ct. 94, 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956). The question of whether so much of a tape recording is inaudible or the circumstances surrounding it are so suspicious and make it so untrustworthy that it should not be admitted into evidence in the first place is…
-
United States v. Maxwell, 383 F.2d 437 (2d Cir. 1967)…ces). See also, United States v. Youngblood, 379 F. 2d 365 (2d Cir. June 21, 1967). Secondly, Colson testified at trial as to the substance of the taped conversation. See, Monroe v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D. C. 228, 234 F. 2d 49, 55, cert. denied 352 U.S. 873, 77 S.Ct. 94, 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956). Cf. United States v. White, 223 F. 2d 674 (2d Cir. 1955). Finally, the transcript did not refer to Aiken and was admitted only against Maxwell; hence, Aiken’s claim is frivolous. Aiken further argues that certain…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence