WILLIAMS

v.

PETERS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Gorko v. Commanding Officer, 314 F.2d 858 (10th Cir. 1963)
  …. See Art. 2(1), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 802 (1). . Carter v. McClaughry, 183 U.S. 365, 383, 22 S.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed. 236. Cf. Lee v. Madigan, 358 U.S. 228, 231, 79 S.Ct. 276, 3 L.Ed.2d 260. . Day v. Davis, 10 Cir., 235 F. 2d 379, 385, certiorari denied, 352 U.S. 881, 77 S.Ct. 104, 1 L.Ed.2d 81. . See Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354, 361, 77 S.Ct. 481, 1 L.Ed.2d 393. . Dean v. United States, 8 Cir., 30 F. 2d 523. Cf. Tilghman v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 168 F. 2d 946. . Gusik v. Schilder, 340 U.S. 128, 131, 71…
• People OF THE United States v. Bibb, 255 F.2d 772 (7th Cir. 1958)
  …by the plaintiff under the Civil Rights Act * * * be and the same is hereby dismissed.” The dismissal of the complaint without a dismissal of the action is not a final order. Williams v. Peters, 9 Cir., 1957, [*774] 233 F. 2d 618, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 881, 77 S.Ct. 104, 1 L.Ed.2d 81. See Reynolds v. Wade, 9 Cir., 1957, 241 F. 2d 208; Dyar v. McCandless, 8 Cir., 1929, 33 F. 2d 578, 579. However, where the district court completely determines there is no right of action and intends to terminate the lit…
• DAY v. Wilson, 247 F.2d 60 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
  …tates District [*62] Court for the District of Kansas. The writ was issued, but was afterwards discharged, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the order discharging it. Day v. Davis, 235 F. 2d 379, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 881, 77 S.Ct. 104, 1 L.Ed.2d 81, rehearing denied, 352 U.S. 913, 77 S.Ct. 152, 1 L.Ed.2d 120. We think the United States District Court for the District of Columbia erred in dismissing, on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction, the petition the appell…

  ← 1 / 2 →