MISSOURI ET AL.

v.

DAVEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 463 F.2d 268 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …1949). An appellate court likewise has continuing power to accept and pass upon a petition to clarify an outstanding mandate. Bailey v. Henslee, 309 F. 2d 840 (8th Cir. 1962); Meredith v. Fair, 306 F. 2d 374 (5th Cir. 1962);14 cf. McNally v. Teets, 352 U.S. 886, 77 S.Ct. 134, 1 L.Ed.2d 923 (1956). c. Fraud on the court, or other misconduct affecting integrity of judicial process There is firmly established in the law the doctrine confirming the power of a court to set aside at any time any mandate that w…
• United States v. Ohio Power Co., 353 U.S. 98 (U.S. 1957)
  …came effective. From then until today I have discovered but three cases in which the Court has granted rehearing out of time, all involving situations quite dissimilar to that presented here: Remmer v. United States, 348 U. S. 904; McNally v. Teets, 352 U. S. 886; Achilli v. United States, 352 U. S. 1023.17 Remmer was a criminal case which had been remanded to the lower court for further proceedings, and where the petition for [*107] rehearing raised questions which could again be brought to this Court on ce…