KENNY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United States, 409 U.S. 232 (U.S. 1972)
  …on commenced by the Government under 18 U. S. C. § 545 and 19 U. S. C. § 1460. The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit agrees with the view of the Fifth Circuit in the present case. See [*234] Leiser v. United States, 234 F. 2d 648, cert. denied, 352 U. S. 893 (1956). We need not, and do not, decide whether an acquittal under § 545 bars a forfeiture under § 545. The judge at the criminal trial specifically stated: “He is, obviously, a sophisticated dealer in emeralds and other jewelry. “I don’t condon…
• United States v. MacKey, 345 F.2d 499 (7th Cir. 1965)
  …dmissible in cases of this type to aid the jury in understanding a complex fact situation. United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503, 519, 63 S.Ct. 1233, 87 L.Ed. 1546 (1943). See United States v. Doyle, 7 Cir., 234 F. 2d 788, 794 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 893, 77 S.Ct. 132, 1 L.Ed.2d 87. We have read Harrington’s testimony and do not find its admission to constitute prejudicial error. Ill Defendant raises various other issues, inter alia, whether the indictment was defective; whether the trial judge imp…
• United States v. Guajardo-Melendez, 401 F.2d 35 (7th Cir. 1968)
  …0] comments which are supported by the evidence of record in the case. An advocate is likewise within the bounds of propriety in replying to an argument raised by his opposing advocate. United States v. Doyle, 234 F. 2d 788 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 893, 77 S.Ct. 132, 1 L.Ed.2d 87 (1956). These two principles dispose of Hernandez’ challenge to three of the four statements of the assistant United States Attorney. First, the evidence introduced by the Government provided a foundation for the comment…