MULLEN

v.

FOLSOM, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Citator

Cited By

• O'Malley v. United States, 285 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1961)
  …2d 229, 230. See also: Loum v. Underwood, 6 Cir., 262 F. 2d 866. In our opinion, the District Judge was not in error in declining to give the amended motion further consideration. Dunn v. United States, 6 Cir., 234 F. 2d 219, 221, certiorari denied, 352 U.S. 899, 77 S.Ct. 140, 1 L.Ed.2d 90. The judgment is affirmed.…
• Smith v. United States, 270 F.2d 921 (D.C. Cir. 1959)
  …ut may do so in the exercise of a sound discretion, its action being reviewable for abuse of discretion. Turner v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 313, 258 F. 2d 165. And see Dunn v. United States, 6 Cir., 1956, 234 F. 2d 219, 221, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 899, 77 S.Ct. 140, 1 L.Ed.2d 90, and Chief Judge Laws’ opinion in United States v. Newman, D.C.D.C.1954, 126 F.Supp. 94.3 In short, the refusal of the court to entertain the motion was judicial action subject to judicial review under the terms of § 2255…
• Jackson v. State OF Ala., 530 F.2d 1231 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …nal guarantee. See Jones v. Cupp, 9 Cir. 1971, 452 F. 2d 1091; Williams v. United States, 1964, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 255, 335 F. 2d 290; Graham v. Thompson, 10 Cir. 1957, 246 F. 2d 805; Comerford v. Commonwealth, 1 Cir. 1956, 233 F. 2d 294, cert. denied 352 U.S. 899, 77 S.Ct. 141, 1 L.Ed.2d 90. POST SENTENCE JAIL TIME Under Alabama law a convicted felon is given the option of taking either a “non-working” appeal under Title 15, Section 372, Code of Alabama (Recomp. 1958) or a “working” appeal under Title 15,…

  ← 1 / 2 →