ROLIE
v.
RANDOLPH, WARDEN, ET AL.
ROLIE
RANDOLPH, WARDEN, ET AL.
352 U.S. 900
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wood v. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc., 386 F.2d 121 (3d Cir. 1967)…te law will not be declared to be a denial of due process. Gryger v. Burke, 1948, 334 U.S. 728, 68 S.Ct. 1256, 92 L.Ed. 1683, rehearing denied 335 U.S. 837, 69 S.Ct. 13, 93 L. Ed. 389. See, also, Rupp v. Teets, 235 F. 2d 674, C.A.9, 1956, cert. den. 352 U.S. 900, 77 S.Ct. 139, 1 L.Ed.2d 92. The Constitution does not guarantee [*125] that the decision of state courts shall be free from error, or require that pronouncements shall be consistent. Worcester County Trust Co. v., Riley, 302 U.S. 292, 58 S.Ct. 185,…
-
Carter v. Peppersack, 242 F.2d 750 (4th Cir. 1957)…reason to think that the case has not been properly handled by them. See opinion of Judge Chesnut below and also the opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Carter v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 210 Md. 657, 124 A. 574, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 900, 77 S.Ct. 136, 1 L.Ed. 89. See also Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 463-465, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469. As there is no certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253, the appeal must be dismissed. Presley v. Pepersack, 4 Cir., 227 F.…