HOUSTON
v.
TEXAS
HOUSTON
TEXAS
352 U.S. 905
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 (U.S. 1957)…n” conferred upon the Secretary by the latter provision, and granted summary judgment in favor of respondents in all other respects.12 The Court of Appeals affirmed, 98 U. S. App. D. C. 268, 235 F. 2d [*372] 215, and this Court granted certiorari, 352 U. S. 905, because of the importance of the questions involved to federal administrators and employees alike. Petitioner here attacks the validity of the termination of his employment on two separate grounds: First, he contends that the Secretary’s exercise…
-
Gov't & Civic Emps. Org. Comm. v. Windsor, 353 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1957)…that the Alabama courts have not construed the Act “in such a manner as to render it unconstitutional, and, of course, we cannot assume that the State courts will ever so construe said statute.” 146 F. Supp. 214, 216. We noted probable jurisdiction. 352 U. S. 905. We do not reach the constitutional issues. In an action brought to restrain the enforcement of a state statute on constitutional grounds, the federal court should retain jurisdiction until a definitive determination of local law questions is obtai…
-
Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United States, 355 U.S. 554 (U.S. 1958)…er prohibiting carriage of unauthorized goods was entered. 63 M. C. C. 407. After a three-judge District Court refused to enjoin enforcement of the order, 150 F. Supp. 181, direct appeal was taken to this Court, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 352 U. S. 905 (1956). For reasons hereinafter stated we affirm the judgment of the District Court. [*556] Appellant’s predecessor, Andrew G. Nelson, having operated as a contract carrier before enactment of the Motor Carrier Act, applied for a permit to continu…