KOKOMO PAPER HANDLERS' UNION NO. 34 ET AL.

v.

CUNEO PRESS, INC.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• United States v. Decoster, 624 F.2d 196 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …rless Inc. Co., 103 U.S.App.D.C. 125, 127, 255 F. 2d 534, 536 (1958); Thompson v. Thompson, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 285, 286, 244 F. 2d 374, 375 (1957). See also District of Columbia v. Washington Post Co., 98 U.S.App.D.C. 304, 235 F. 2d 531, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 912, 77 S.Ct. 147, 1 L.Ed.2d 118 (1956) and District of Columbia v. Grimes, supra at 370, 404 F. 2d at 1347 (McGowan, J., dissenting). This is particularly true since the bulk of the affected cases are less than ten years old, and so are certainly recen…
• Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp. v. United States, 493 F.2d 112 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …rnment’s purpose in seeking contempt clearly was to punish past conduct and to deter future conduct. This is a criminal sanction. McCrone v. United States, 307 U.S. 61, 64 (1939) ; MacNeil v. United States, 236 F. 2d 149, 154 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 912 (1956) ; United States v. International Union, United Mine Workers, 190 F. 2d 865, 873 (D.C.Cir. 1951). . In United States v. UMW, 70 F.Supp. 42 (D.D.C.1946), modified and affirmed, 330 U.S. 258 (1947), although the severity of the harm caused by a…
• Bullock v. United States, 265 F.2d 683 (6th Cir. 1959)
  …and technical than those of the statutes under which criminal causes are instituted. The contempt proceeding is summary in character and technical pleadings are not required. MacNeil v. United States, 1 [*692] Cir., 236 F. 2d 149, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 912, 77 S.Ct. 150, 1 L.Ed.2d 119. See also United States v. United Mine Workers of America, supra, 330 U.S. at pages 296-297, 67 S.Ct. at pages 697, 698. In that case the contempt described in the petition was not denominated “ei'iminal as required by t…