DRATH, TRADING AS BROADWAY GIFT CO.,

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Cliett v. Hammonds, 305 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …ging herself by compliance was, and is, proper. Reversed in part, modified and affirmed in part. . Scott v. Smith, 5 Cir., 1936, 84 F. 2d 489; Cliett v. Scott, 5 Cir., 1939, 102 F. 2d 725; Cliett v. Scott, 5 Cir., 1956, 233 F. 2d 269, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 917, 77 S.Ct. 215, 1 L.Ed.2d 123; Cliett v. Hammonds, 5 Cir., 1959, 265 F. 2d 933; Cliett v. Hammonds, 5 Cir., 1961, 286 F. 2d 471, cert. denied, 366 U.S. 960, 81 S.Ct. 1921, 6 L.Ed.2d 1253. . For simplicity we refer to all of those adjudged to own the…
• Inglett & Co., Inc. v. Everglades Fertilizer Co., Inc., 255 F.2d 342 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …f a patent ease.” Hyeon Mfg. Co. v. H. Koch & Sons, 9 Cir., 219 F. 2d 353. . See George P. Converse & Co. v. Polaroid Corporation, 1 Cir., 242 F. 2d 116; Vermont Structural Slate Co. v. Tatko Bros. Slate Co., 2 Cir., 233 F. 2d 9, cer-tiorari denied 352 U.S. 917, 77 S.Ct. 216, 1 L.Ed.2d 123; Bobertz v. General Motors Corp., 6 Cir., 228 F. 2d 94; Magee v. Cola-Cola Co., 7 Cir., 232 F. 2d 596; Syracuse v. Paris, 9 Cir., 234 F. 2d 65. . That Mr. Stoll inevitably succumbed to the nature of Ms calling is appare…
• George P. Converse & Co., Inc. v. Polaroid Corp., 242 F.2d 116 (1st Cir. 1957)
  …r art and “[t]he prior art and the patent claims are, without expert aid, easily understandable by anyone of the most modest intelligence.” Vermont Structural Slate Co. v. Tatko Bros. Slate Co., 2 Cir., 1956, 233 F. 2d 9, 10, certiorari denied 1956, 352 U.S. 917, 77 S.Ct. 216, 1 L.Ed.2d 123. See Brisk Waterproofing Co. v. A. Belanger & Sons, 1 Cir., 1954, 209 F. 2d 169. Of course, as the Tatko case, 233 F. 2d at page 10, points out, in doing so “a judge should exercise unusual caution,” for, “[i]n many a pa…