J. M. CARRAS, INC.,

v.

DIESEL TANKER A. C. DODGE, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• A. C. Ball Co. v. The United States, 531 F.2d 993 (Ct. Cl. 1976)
  …Court in construing the 1943 Act did not feel itself bound by a determination by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Marie & Alex Manoogian Fund v. Renegotiation Board, 24 T.C. 412, 415 (1955), app. dismissed, 232 F. 2d 758 (C.A.6), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 929, 77 S.Ct. 228, 1 L.Ed.2d 164 (1956); Puget Sound Machinery Depot v. Land et al., 17 P-H Tax Ct.Mem. 617, 630, 4 CCF ¶ 60,535, at p. 50,927 (1948); Eastern Machinery Co. v. Under Secretary of War, 12 T.C. 71, 74 (1949), aff’d. 86 U.S.App.D.C. 331, 18…
• Metallurgical, Inc. v. The Renegotiation Bd., 382 F.2d 843 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …that has grown up under it”. This settled the conflict between the District of Columbia and Ninth Circuits. The limited review concept was approved in Marie and Alex Manoogian Fund v. United States, 212 F. 2d 369, 370 (6th Cir. 1954), cert. denied 352 U.S. 929, 77 S.Ct. 228, 1 L.Ed.2d 164, by the Sixth Circuit prior to United States v. California Eastern Line, Inc., supra (1955), and subsequently followed by that Circuit in Ebco Manufacturing Company v. Secretary of Commerce,5 221 F. 2d 902 (6 Cir. 1955),…