HOLMSTROM

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ins. Agents' Int'l Union, Afl-Cio, 361 U.S. 477 (U.S. 1960)
  …of conduct per se, and without regard to ascertainment of a state of [*509] mind. It relies upon four cases: H. J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board, 311 U. S. 514; Labor Board v. Crompton-Highland Mills, 337 U. S. 217; Labor Board v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 352 U. S. 938; and Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U. S. 342. These cases do not sustain its position. While it is plain that the per se proscription of an employer’s refusal, to reduce a collective agreement to writing was approved in the Heinz case, it i…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Indus. Co., 385 U.S. 432 (U.S. 1967)
  …imilarly, the duty to bargain unquestionably extends beyond the period of contract negotiations and applies to labor-management relations during the term of an agreement. NLRB v. C & C Plywood Corp., ante, p. 421; Labor Board v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 352 U. S. 938. The only real issue in this case, therefore, is whether the Board must await an arbitrator’s determination of the relevancy of the requested information before it can enforce the union’s statutory rights under § 8 (a)(5). The two cases upon which…
• The Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963)
  …evance under the bargaining agreement and the union’s bona fide actions in administering the bargaining agreement during the period of its existence. J. I. Case Company v. N. L. R. B., 253 F. 2d 149, 155, C.A.7th; N. L. R. B. v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 352 U.S. 938, 77 S.Ct. 261, 1 L.Ed.2d 235, reversing N. L. R. B. v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 235 F. 2d 319, C.A.9th; N. L. R. B. v. Otis Elevator Co., 208 F. 2d 176, C.A. 2nd; N. L. R. B. v. Whiting Machine Works, 217 F. 2d 593, 594, C.A.4th, cert. denied, 349 U.S.…