MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR,

v.

FEINBERG

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Ross v. United States, 374 F.2d 97 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …a clear intent on the part of Congress to extend federal protection over mail matter from the time it enters the mails until it reaches the addressee or his authorized agent”. Maxwell v. United States, 235 F. 2d 930, 932 (8 Cir. 1956), cert, denied 352 U.S. 943, 77 S.Ct. 266, 1 L.Ed.2d 239. We would be reluctant to retreat from that broad approach and now to construe § 1702 narrowly so as to defeat this congressional purpose and enable an accused to avoid responsibility on the technical argument that inter…
• United States v. Wade, 364 F.2d 931 (6th Cir. 1966)
  …very, violated the statute which was designed to protect the mail from every kind of danger, theft, or taking. (Emphasis ours.) United States v. Maxwell, D.C., 137 F.Supp. 298; Maxwell v. United States, C.A.Mo. 1956, 235 F. 2d 930, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 943, 77 S.Ct. 266, 1 L.Ed.2d 239. In Doub v. United States (9th Cir.), 1965, 341 F. 2d 572, certiorari denied 382 U.S. 851, 86 S.Ct. 98, the defendant, when arrested for another offense, was found in possession of three checks taken from the mail some…
• United States v. Ashford, 530 F.2d 792 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …ysically delivered to the person to whom it is directed or to his authorized agent, and this court is committed to that view. Ross v. United States, 374 F. 2d 97, 103 (8th Cir. 1967); Maxwell v. United States, 235 F. 2d 930 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 943, 77 S.Ct. 266, 1 L.Ed.2d 239 (1956). See also United States v. Brown, 425 F. 2d 1172 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Wade, 364 F. 2d 931 (6th Cir. 1966). As thus construed, § 1702 is a broader statute than § 1708 under which the second count of t…