NELSON ET AL.
v.
TENNESSEE
NELSON ET AL.
TENNESSEE
352 U.S. 951
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shoreline Enters. OF Am., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 262 F.2d 933 (5th Cir. 1959)…ng only by persons labelled “officers” in union constitutions. In two circuits since the Coca-Cola decision the courts have taken a broader view. N. L. R. B. v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co., 1 Cir., 1956, 235 F. 2d 700, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 951, 77 S.Ct. 325, 1 L.Ed.2d 242; N. L. R. B. v. Puerto Rico Food Products Corp., 1 Cir., 1956, 232 F. 2d 515; Goodman Manufacturing Co. v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 1955, 227 F. 2d 465, dismissed by consent, 1956, 351 U.S. 901, 76 S.Ct. 692, 100 L.Ed. 1439,…
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cap. Bakers, Inc., 351 F.2d 45 (3d Cir. 1965)…this objection before the Court since this has been his position from the inception of the proceedings, and the Board has been adequately appraised of his intention to rely on this. N. L. R. B. v. Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co., 235 F. 2d 700, cert. den. 352 U.S. 951, 77 S.Ct. 325, 1 L.Ed.2d 242 (1st Cir. 1956); N. L. R. B. v. Revere Metal Art Co., 280 F. 2d 96, cert. den. 364 U.S. 894, 81 S.Ct. 225, 5 L.Ed.2d 189 (2nd Cir., 1960). In fact, at the unfair labor practice hearing, the Trial Examiner specifically n…
-
Editorial "EL Imparcial v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 278 F.2d 184 (1st Cir. 1960)…o respondent to refute such evidence. National Labor Relations Board v. Puerto Rico Food Products Corp., 1 Cir., 1956, 232 F. 2d 515; National Labor Relations Board v. Eastern Massachusetts St. Ry. Co., 1 Cir., 235 F. 2d 700, certiorari denied 1956, 352 U.S. 951, 77 S.Ct. 325, 1 L.Ed.2d 242. The answer of petitioners sets up a defense of no obligation to recognize or bargain with the Union because of the Union’s lack of compliance with Sections 9(f), (g), and (h) of the Act. This defense is clearly without…