PENNSYLVANIA

v.

EASTMAN KODAK CO.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Chaunt v. United States, 364 U.S. 350 (U.S. 1960)
  …pitude” is gratuitous. This Court has never so held. Corrado v. United States, 227 F. 2d 780 (C. A. 6th Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U. S. 925; United States v. Montalbano, 236 F. 2d 757 (C. A. 3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Genovese v. United States, 352 U. S. 952; United States v. humantes, 139 F. Supp. 574 (D. C. N. D. Calif.), aff’d per curiam, 232 F. 2d 216 (C. A. 9th Cir.); Stacher v. United States, 258 F. 2d 112 (C. A. 9th Cir.), cert. denied, [*358] 358 U. S. 907; United States v. Accardo, 113 F. Supp.…
• Milgo Elec. Corp. v. United Bus. Commc'ns, Inc., 623 F.2d 645 (10th Cir. 1980)
  …. Once UBC had actual notice of Mil-go’s patent rights, UBC was under an affirmative duty to exercise due care to determine whether or not it was infringing Milgo’s patents. Coleman Co. v. Holly Mfg. Co, 269 F. 2d 660, 666 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 952, 77 S.Ct. 326, 1 L.Ed.2d 243 (1959). UBC did not heed the suggestion of its vice president Reed Manning that its modems might be infringing, and made no effort to secure an opinion from patent counsel. Cf. Union Carbide Corp. v. Graver Tank & Mfg. C…
• Moist Cold Refrigerator Co., Inc. v. LOU Johnson Co., Inc., 249 F.2d 246 (9th Cir. 1957)
  …ful and unexpected result” ; whether or not there was an “additional or different function”; whether the whole did or did not, in some way, exceed the sum of its parts. Coleman Co. v. Holly Mfg. Co., 9 Cir., 1956, 233 F. 2d 71, 79, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 952, 72 S.Ct. 326, 1 L.Ed.2d 243; Jacuzzi Bros., Inc., v. Berkeley Pump Co., supra; Kwikset Locks, Inc., v. Hillgren, supra; Stearns v. Tinker & Rasor, 9 Cir., 220 F. 2d 49, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 830, 76 S.Ct. 62, 100 L.Ed. 741; Filtex Corp. v. Ame…