HOME UTILITIES CO., INC.,
v.
EASTMAN KODAK CO.

U.S. | 1957-01-12
No. 266
352 U.S. 956 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Simmons v. The City OF Philadelphia, 947 F.2d 1042 (3d Cir. 1991)
    …t court in support of that proposition, School Dist. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 417 Pa. 277, 207 A. 2d 864 (1965); Ebald v. City of Philadelphia, 387 Pa. 407, 128 A. 2d 352 (1957); In re Addison, 385 Pa. 48, 122 A. 2d 272 (1956), appeal dismissed, 352 U.S. 956, 77 S.Ct. 353, 1 L.Ed.2d 316 (1957), were concerned with zoning and personnel management, topics which may well be classified as matters of purely local interest. Relying on the reasoning in the Boren-stein case, a divided Commonwealth Court of Pen…
  • Carter v. City OF Philadelphia, 989 F.2d 117 (3d Cir. 1993)
    …tity of municipal legislation of civil service affairs, see In re Addison, 385 Pa. 48, 122 A. 2d 272 (1956) (provision of Home Rule Charter governing appeals of civil service decisions not nullified by conflicting general statute), appeal dismissed, 352 U.S. 956, 77 S.Ct. 353, 1 L.Ed.2d 316 (1957); Ebald v. Philadelphia, 387 Pa. 407, 128 A. 2d 352 (1957) (city civil service regulation governing disability compensation is municipal concern and superseded conflicting state statute); Lennox v. Clark, 372 Pa. 3…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw