COOPER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1957)
  …uit Justice for the Second Circuit. 1 L. Ed. 2d 34, 77 Sup. Ct. 17. 138 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 909, 292 P. 2d 90. This is the highest state appellate court available to the appellant. Cal. Const., Art. VI, §5; see Edwards v. California, 314 U. S. 160. 352 U. S. 962. No issue is presented in either case concerning the obscenity of the material involved. See also the following cases in which convictions under obscenity statutes have been reviewed: Grimm v. United States, 156 U. S. 604; Rosen v. United States,…
• Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1957)
  …other three deemed a brief disposition justified by “ample authority.” 1 N. Y. 2d 177, 189, 134 N. E. 2d 461, 468. A claim under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment made throughout the state litigation brought the case here on appeal. 352 U. S. 962. [*440] Neither in the New York Court of Appeals, nor here, did appellants assail the legislation insofar as it outlaws obscenity. The claim they make lies within a very narrow compass. Their attack is upon the power of New York to employ the remedi…
• United States v. Sharpnack, 355 U.S. 286 (U.S. 1958)
  …similate and adopt criminal statutes of a state which are enacted by the state subsequent to the enactment of the Federal Assimilative Statute.” 2 The United States appealed to this Court under 18 U. S. C. § 3731, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 352 U. S. 962. The 1948 Assimilative Crimes Act was enacted as part of the Revised Criminal Code of the United States and reads as follows: “§ 13. Laws of States adopted for areas within Federal jurisdiction. “Whoever within or upon any of the places now exist…