ROTH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1957)
  …misdemeanor. . . .” West’s Cal. Penal Code Ann., 1955, § 311. In Both, reliance is placed on the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and in Alberts, reliance is placed upon the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 237 F. 2d 796. 352 U. S. 964. Petitioner’s application for bail was granted by Mr. Justice Harlan in his capacity as Circuit Justice for the Second Circuit. 1 L. Ed. 2d 34, 77 Sup. Ct. 17. 138 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 909, 292 P. 2d 90. This is the highest state appellate court avai…
• United States v. Cent. Eureka Mining Co., 357 U.S. 155 (U.S. 1958)
  …just compensation. 134 Ct. Cl. 1, 53, 56, 138 F. Supp. 281, 310, 312.9 A new trial was denied. 134 Ct. Cl. 130, 146 F. Supp. 476. We granted the Government’s petition for certiorari in order to consider the important constitutional issue presented. 352 U. S. 964. Before reaching the merits, we face the suggestion of respondents that the Special Jurisdictional Act of July 14, 1952, 66 Stat. 605, did more than waive the statute [*163] of limitations and the defense of laches. Respondents contend that this Ac…
• Roth v. United States, 255 F.2d 440 (2d Cir. 1958)
  …PER CURIAM. The appellant’s criminal conviction for sending obscene matter through the mails was affirmed by this court, 237 F. 2d 796, and by the Supreme Court, 352 U.S. 964, 77 S.Ct. 361, 1 L.Ed.2d 319. Thereafter he made a motion in the district court for reduction of his five-year sentence to the time already served. Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P. This appeal is from the denial of that motion. There is no question but that t…