BALANOVSKI ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Pac. GAS & Elec. Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 506 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …936); Amoco Oil Co. v. EPA, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 162, at 174, 501 F. 2d 722, at 734-735 (1974). . See, e. g., Wisconsin v. FPC, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 260, 292 F. 2d 753 (1961); Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. FPC, 236 F. 2d 785, 791 (5th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 968, 77 S.Ct. 356, 1 L.Ed.2d 322 (1957); Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. FPC, 231 F. 2d 461 (10th Cir. 1956). . Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft v. CAB, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 191, 194 & n. 5, 479, F. 2d 912, 915 & n. 5 (1973); Mobil Oil Corp. v. FPC, 152 U.…
• United States v. First Nat'l City Bank, 379 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1965)
  …ized, but instead treated as a general appearance, personal jurisdiction would be obtained. (There is a split of authority as to whether limited appearances are permitted. See United States v. Balanovski, 236 F. 2d 298 (C. A. 2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U. S. 968, and cases cited therein. See also Developments in the Law: State-Court Jurisdiction, 73 Harv. L. Rev. 909, 953 (1960).) Whether or not a rule against limited appearances should prevail in our federal courts, it is clear that no argument for having…
• J. M. Huber Corp. v. Denman, 367 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 5 Cir., 1962, 299 F. 2d 692, cert. denied, 371 U.S. 887, 83 S.Ct. 182, 9 L.Ed.2d 121, following the stay of this Court issued in Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 1956, 236 F. 2d 785, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 968, 77 S.Ct. 356, 1 L.Ed.2d 322. Thus we end, as we began, a consideration of these factors pro and con demonstrate that there is at least an arguable basis for FPC jurisdiction. Moreover, these factors ought first to be evaluated by the FPC in the re…

  ← 1 / 2 →