OLENDER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Skorman v. Hovnanian OF Fla., Inc., 382 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
  …ith him in his professional capacity as a lawyer, no privilege attaches. Pollock v. U. S., 202 F. 2d 281 (5th Cir.1954), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 993, 73 S.Ct. 1133, 97 L.Ed. 1401 (1953); Olender v. U. S., 210 F. 2d 795 (9th Cir.1954), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 982, 77 S.Ct. 382, 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957); 8 Am.Jur.2d, Witnesses § 182. Thus, where a lawyer is engaged to advise a person as to business matters as opposed to legal matters, or when he is employed to act simply as an agent to perform some non-legal act…
• United States v. MacKiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …tes v. Winfree, 170 F.Supp. 659 (E.D.Pa.1959) ; contra, Peek v. United States, 321 F. 2d 934 (9 Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 954, 84 S.Ct. 973, 11 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964) (dictum) ; Olender v. United States, 210 F. 2d 795 (9 Cir.1954), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 982, 77 S.Ct. 382, 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957) (dictum). Mrs. Mackiewicz further contends that since these are out-of-court statements, they are hearsay. 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2232 (McNaughton Rev.1961). However, the danger of hearsay statements is that the d…
• Allied Chem. Corp. v. Hess Tankship Co. OF Del., 661 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …make the time for a plot. Afran Transport Co. v. The BERGECHIEF, 274 F. 2d 469, 475 (2nd Cir. 1960); SS PONCE DE LEON, supra; see also Polarus Steamship Co. v. T/S SANDEFJORD, 236 F. 2d 270 (2nd Cir. 1956), cert. denied, Rederi v. Polarus S.S. Co., 352 U.S. 982, 77 S.Ct. 383, 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957). The rule of Afran Transport necessitates only a modicum of effort for great potential benefits. By plotting the movement of radar blips representing REFINER, SOCRATES could have detected the possibility of a col…