LESTER

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. 605 (U.S. 1983)
  …tical to Article IX were included, subsequent modifications were made in reaction to changed circumstances. Wisconsin v. Illinois, 278 U. S. 367 (1929), 281 U. S. 179, decree entered, 281 U. S. 696 (1930), temporarily modified, 352 U. S. 945 (1956), 352 U. S. 983 (1957), superseded, 388 U. S. 426 (1967); New Jersey v. New York, 283 U. S. 336, decree entered, 283 U. S. 805 (1931), modified, 347 U. S. 995 (1954).16 The Court’s purpose in retaining jurisdiction in those cases can be gleaned from the respective…
• Marshall v. OVE Skou Rederi A/S, 378 F.2d 193 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …ford v. Caswell, 200 F. 2d 830, 832 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 345 [*197] U.S. 940, 73 S.Ct. 831, 97 L.Ed. 1136 (1953); I ester v. United States, 234 F. 2d 625 (2d Cir.) cert. granted, 352 U.S. 889, 77 S.Ct. 130, 1 L.Ed.2d 85 (1956), appeal dismissed, 352 U.S. 983, 77 S.Ct. 384, 1 L.Ed.2d 366 (1957); Walker v. Sinclair Refining Co., supra. Articulating criteria to determine seaworthiness requires use of the language of negligence.6 In the language of Walk [*198] er v. Harris, supra, “ * * * What is the [gear…
• Faraola v. Jack O'Neill and the Yacht Marie Celine, 576 F.2d 1364 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …it imposes strict liability upon a shipowner, “[sjeaworthiness is a relative term; a vessel may have that quality in port, and yet be wholly unfit for rough water . . . .” Lester v. United States, 234 F. 2d 625, 629 (2d Cir. 1956), appeal dismissed, 352 U.S. 983, 77 S.Ct. 130, 1 L.Ed.2d 85 (1957), quoting Hanrahan v. Pacific Transport Co., 262 F. 951, 952 (2d Cir. 1919). This relativity is. a function of the risk from which this doctrine is intended to protect the seaman. Because a seaman must be protecte…