UNITED STATES
v.
OHIO POWER CO.
UNITED STATES
OHIO POWER CO.
352 U.S. 987
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sears v. San Diego Cnty. Dist. Council of Carpenters, 436 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1978)…ubtedly obtain were an employer subjected to recognitional or secondary picketing to seek injunctive relief in state court on the theory that the union was tortiously interfering with his freedom to contract. Cf. Retail Clerks v. J. J. Newberry Co., 352 U. S. 987, summarily rev’g 78 Idaho 85, 298 P. 2d 375 (1956). One of the factors identified by the Court was that the conduct giving rise to the state cause of action (e. g., violence, libel, or intentional infliction of emotional distress), if proved, would…
-
Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists v. Gonzales, 356 U.S. 617 (U.S. 1958)…ct. District Lodge 34, Int’l [*625] Assn, of Machinists v. L. P. Cavett Co., 355 U. S. 39; Local Union 429, Int’l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Farnsworth & Chambers Co., 353 U. S. 969; Retail Clerks International Assn. v. J. J. Newberry Co., 352 U. S. 987; Pocatello Building & Constr. Trades Council v. C. H. Elle Constr. Co., 352 U. S. 884; Building Trades Council v. Kinard Constr. Co., 346 U. S. 933. With the exception of cases allowing the State to exercise its police power to punish or prevent vio…