BRADFORD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• England v. La. State Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 375 U.S. 411 (U.S. 1964)
  …ant’s federal claims were decided by the District Court following decision upon the same claims by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and denial by us of certiorari to that court’s judgment. Mack v. Pennsylvania, 386 Pa. 251,126 A. 2d 679, cert. denied, 352 U. S. 1002. See Note, 59 Col. L. Rev. 749, 773 (1959); Note, 73 Harv. L. Rev. 1358, 1364 (1960), quoting brief for appellant, p. 5, in Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections, 360 U. S. 45. It has been suggested that state courts may “take no more…
• Estes v. Texas, 381 U.S. 532 (U.S. 1965)
  …ing that Maryland would probably bar television from the courtroom if faced with the problem; and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania cited with approval Canon 35 in Mack Appeal, 386 Pa. 251, 257, n.5, 126 A. 2d 679, 681-682, n.4 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U. S. 1002, see 48 J. Am. Jud. Soc. 200 (1965). Rule 53 provides: “The taking of photographs in the court room during the progress of judicial proceedings or radio broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the court room shall not be permitted by the court.”…
• United States v. Mouzin, 785 F.2d 682 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …U.S. at 547, 88 S.Ct. at 1224; Theard, 354 U.S. at 281-82, 77 S.Ct. at 1276. Disciplinary orders affecting an attorney’s bar status do not warrant the application of per se rules. United States v. Bradford, 238 F. 2d 395 (2d Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1002, 77 S.Ct. 558, 1 L.Ed.2d 546 (1957) (right to counsel not violated where defendant was represented in federal court by member of New York bar who had not applied for admission to practice in the federal bar); accord, Derringer v. United States, 441…