JOSE BETH OTIS, APPELLANT,
v.
BERNARD A. WIEDER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1966-02-01
No. 65-410
Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
183 So. 2d 235 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*236PER CURIAM.

The order of the trial judge dismissing appellant’s counterclaim, for failure to state a cause of action, is affirmed upon authority of Raphael v. Koretzky, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 746. See also Weekley v. Knight, 116 Fla. 721, 156 So. 625 (1934); Suritz v. Kelner, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 831; Campbell v. Magana, 184 Cal.App.2d 751, 8 Cal.Rptr. 32 (1960); and anno., 45 A.L.R.2d 5.

Appellant’s contention that she was deprived of an opportunity to amend her counterclaim is conclusively refuted by the record.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Otis v. Weider, 189 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 1966)
    …Certiorari denied without opinion. 183 So. 2d 235.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw