SHREVEPORT TELEVISION CO.

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 463 F.2d 268 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …§ 405 the FCC loses jurisdiction to reopen a record to consider subsequent events when an appeal is taken, or the time for appeal has expired, and that the court cannot confer jurisdiction on the FCC by a remand. . Shreveport Television Co. v. FCC, 352 U.S. 1014, 77 S.Ct. 560, 1 L.Ed.2d 547 (1957). . WHDII, Inc., 22 F.C.C. 767, 865 (1957). . 124 U.S.App.D.C. 230, 363 F. 2d 717. . The FCC’s Opposition set forth that Mr. Zinn’s withdrawal did not “change the decisional premises” of the FCC decision, as con…
• United States v. Green, 523 F.2d 229 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …se’s offer of proof, and the possible prejudicial effects, we hold that the court did not abuse its discretion in restricting the scope of cross-examination.7 See Natvig v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 236 F. 2d 694, 697 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1014, 77 S.Ct. 567, 1 L.Ed.2d 551 (1957).8 IV. Finally, appellants contend that the district court should have declared a mistrial because of numerous instances of alleged prosecutorial misconduct. We find a number of these claims to be totally frivolo…
• United States ex rel. Harold Konigsberg v. Warden Henry B. McFARLAND, 348 F.2d 215 (3d Cir. 1965)
  …ty of a future detention under its habeas corpus powers. Palumbo v. State of New Jersey, 334 F. 2d 524, 525-526 (3 Cir. 1964); Gailes v. Yeager, 324 F. 2d 630 (3 Cir. 1963); Ingenito v. State of New Jersey, 238 F. 2d 935 (3 Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1014, 77 S.Ct. 576, 1 L.Ed.2d 560 (1957). Although the court below did not dismiss the petition for habeas corpus on the grounds we have set out, it is well established that an appellate tribunal will affirm a correct decision below even though that dec…