ABRAMS
v.
UNITED STATES
ABRAMS
UNITED STATES
352 U.S. 1018
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Asahel Abrams v. United States, 268 F.2d 582 (D.C. Cir. 1959)…Daugherty, 1926, 269 U.S. 360, 46 S.Ct. 156, 70 L.Ed. 309. The denial of the motion without hearing therefore is Affirmed. . Appellant’s conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. 1956, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 46, 237 F. 2d 42, certiorari denied, 1957, 352 U.S. 1018, 77 S.Ct. 575, 1 L.Ed.2d 554. . This case is not like Gilliam v. United States, - U.S.App.D.C. -, 269 F. 2d 770, No. 14,900 (D.C.Cir.), June 18, 1959, where the written sentence did not conform to the sentence as pronounced and was later correct…
-
United States v. Spencer, 448 F.2d 1093 (D.C. Cir. 1971)…reading of the record leads to a firm conclusion that the assault was part of such an excessive resistance to the arrest as gave solid basis for the jury’s verdict.2 See Abrams v. United States, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 46, 237 F. 2d 42 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1018, 77 S.Ct. 575, 1 L.Ed.2d 554 (1957). Affirmed. . For the somewhat stricter standard of arrest for a misdemeanor compared with arrest for a felony, see Thomas v. United States, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 48, 412 F. 2d 1095 (1969) ; Taylor v. United States, 2…