LEITER MINERALS, INC.,
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.; LA BUY, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, V. HOWES LEATHER CO., INC., ET AL.; FIKES V. ALABAMA; GULF COAST SHRIMPERS & OYSTERMANS ASSOCIATION ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; BALANOVSKI ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON ET AL. V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.; SPIELVOGEL V. FORD, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY, GAS AND ELECTRICITY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.; LEWIS ET UX. V. CARVER, TRUSTEE; LEIGHT V. SCHECHTER, PERSONNEL DIRECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.; COOPER V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1957-02-25
Nos. 26; No. 27; No. 53; No. 480; No. 560; No. 573; No. 588; No. 601; No. 394; No. 406
352 U.S. 1019 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Brown v. United States, 356 F.2d 230 (10th Cir. 1966)
    …existence of threat or inducement. See Thomas v. State of Arizona, 356 U.S. 390, 78 S.Ct. 885, 2 L.Ed.2d 863, reh. denied 357 U.S. 944, 78 S.Ct. 1379, 2 L.Ed.2d 1557; Fikes v. State of Alabama, 352 U.S. 191, 77 S.Ct. 281, 1 L.Ed.2d 246, reh. denied 352 U.S. 1019, 77 S.Ct. 553, 1 L.Ed.2d 561; Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469, reh. denied 345 U.S. 946, 73 S.Ct. 827, 97 L.Ed. 1370; Watts v. State of Indiana, 338 U.S. 49, 69 S.Ct. 1347, 93 L.Ed. 1801. At the hearing to determine the adm…
  • United States v. Ohio Power Co., 353 U.S. 98 (U.S. 1957)
    …ndry Workers v. Western Foundry Co., 352 U. S. 860; Fairmont Aluminum Co. v. Commissioner, 352 U. S. 913; Bernstein v. United States, 352 U. S. 977; Mekolichick v. United States, 352 U. S. 977; Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v. United States, 352 U. S. 1019.20 This history of past practice justifies the assertion that the Court has exercised its inherent power with a sharp eye to the “principle that litigation must at some definite point be brought to an end,” Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-H…
  • …employ Russell. Now, says the railroad, Johnson too was a constructive employee. Johnson mainly answers the contention by saying that Union Pacific put this contention in its brief in the Supreme Court when it requested a rehearing which was denied, 352 U.S. 1019, 77 S.Ct. 555, 1 L.Ed.2d 561. In the petition there the railroad relied heavily on its argument that it was a constructive employer of Johnson and cited the very same City of Idaho Falls case (used by the Supreme Court for the [*677] reversal) as po…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw