JENKINS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1957-03-11
No. 697
352 U.S. 1029 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wilson v. Dixon, 256 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1958)
    …ferson’s attorney in his own habeas corpus proceeding of the above contention and that attorney, of outstanding ability, failed to follow his advice. The judgment is affirmed. . People v. Jefferson, 47 Cal.2d 438, 303 P. 2d 1024, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 1029, 77 S.Ct. 597, 1 L.Ed.2d 600. Section 4500 provides: “Assault with deadly weapon, etc.; life prisoner; death penalty. Every person undergoing a life sentence in a State prison of this State, who, with malice aforethought, commits an assault upon the…
  • Vitagliano v. United States, 601 F.2d 73 (2d Cir. 1979)
    …alternative to the payment of a fine, the defendant is not being doubly punished if his obligation to pay survives his incarceration. United States v. Jenkins, 141 F.Supp. 499, 504-05 (S.D.Ga.), aff’d, 238 F. 2d 83 (5th Cir. 1956), appeal dismissed, 352 U.S. 1029, 77 S.Ct. 595, 1 L.Ed.2d 598 (1957). This being so, we need not reach the question whether appellant’s incarceration was made unlawful by the Supreme Court’s subsequent decisions in Williams and Tate. Whether or not appellant’s imprisonment was la…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw