NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
WOOSTER DIVISION OF BORG-WARNER CORPORATION; AND WOOSTER DIVISION OF BORG-WARNER CORPORATION V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
WOOSTER DIVISION OF BORG-WARNER CORPORATION; AND WOOSTER DIVISION OF BORG-WARNER CORPORATION V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
353 U.S. 907
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Repan v. Am. President Lines, Ltd., 243 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1957)…der Rule 58. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C. A. The time for appeal, therefore, expired on June 22. Edwards v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 2 Cir., 242 F. 2d 888; and F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United States, .2 Cir., 236 F. 2d 889, certiorari granted 353 U.S. 907, 77 S.Ct. 667, 1 L. Ed.2d 662. See also Matteson v. United States, 2 Cir., 240 F. 2d 517. Appeal dismissed.…
-
Cedar Creek OIL & GAS Co. v. Fid. GAS Co., 249 F.2d 277 (9th Cir. 1957)…eal. The motion was denied, 9 Cir., 238 F. 2d 298. Appellees have now invited us to re-examine this matter in the light of the recent case of F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 236 F. 2d 889, in which certiorari has been granted. 353 U.S. 907, 77 S.Ct. 667, 1 L.Ed.2d 662. Our reading of Schaefer does not convince us that this appeal should be dismissed. . For the purposes of this action, appellant Susan M. Wight disclaimed all interest in the only portion of the lands described in the c…