MILLER

v.

FLORIDA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80 (U.S. 1976)
  …ze is not before us in this case. See United States v. Schrimsher, 493 F. 2d 848 (CA5 1974); United States v. Crutcher, 405 F. 2d 239 (CA2 1968), cert. denied, 394 U. S. 908 (1969); see also Krull v. United States, 240 F. 2d 122 (CA5), cert. denied, 353 U. S. 915 (1957). Cf. Pendergraft v. State, 191 So. 2d 830 (Miss. 1966). An attorney must respect the important ethical distinction between discussing testimony and seeking improperly to influence it. Ethical Consideration 7-26 of the American Bar Associatio…
• Jones v. United States, 327 F.2d 867 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
  …the jury, is of opinion that there are palliating or mitigating circumstances.” And see Andres v. United States, 333 U.S. 740, 743 n. 4, 68 S.Ct. 880, 92 L.Ed. 1055 (1948). Cf. Krull v. United States, 240 F. 2d 122, 134, 135 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 915, 77 S.Ct. 764, 1 L.Ed.2d 668 (1957). . The prisoner thus would have been eligible for parole “only after the expiration of twenty years from the date he commences to serve his sentence.” Supra note 4. Under D.C.Code § 24-203 (1961), a sentence of l…
• United States v. Leighton, 386 F.2d 822 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …ection appears to us an attempt to sow reversible error into the record, rather than an effort to indicate to the trial judge that the attorney and client had something to discuss. Compare Krull v. United States, 240 F. 2d 122 (5 Cir.), cert. denied 353 U.S. 915, 77 S.Ct. 764, 1 L.Ed.2d 668 (1957). We conclude that the government has established beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant’s right to the effective assistance of counsel was not impaired by the ruling of the trial court. See Chapman v. State…