MANION ET AL.
v.
KANSAS CITY TERMINAL RAILWAY CO.

U.S. | 1957-04-08
No. 702
353 U.S. 927 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Caution
Cited by 27 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Kansas City Court of Appeals of Missouri must be vacated in the light of our decision in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana R. Co., 353 U. S. 30, because the dispute here is not pending before the National Railroad Adjustment Board. The cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision and without prejudice to the power of the Court of Appeals to reinstate its judgment if the dispute is submitted to the Adjustment Board by either party within a reasonable time.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • Bhd. of Locomotive Eng'rs v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 373 U.S. 33 (U.S. 1963)
    …o compromise them. Such controversies, therefore, are not the same as those- in which the injunction strips labor of its primary weapon without substituting any reasonable alternative.” 353 U. S., at 40-41. Cf. Manion v. Kansas City Terminal R. Co., 353 U. S. 927, which held that injunetive [*40] relief is not available if the processes of the Railway Labor Act Jiave not actually been invoked. Compare Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson, 370 U. S. 195, 210-212. See note 9, supra. See note 9, supra. See note…
  • Rutland Ry. Corp. v. Bhd. OF Locomotive Eng'rs, 307 F.2d 21 (2d Cir. 1962)
    …761, 4 L.Ed.2d 774 (1960). . There is some doubt whether a federal court has power to issue an anti-strike injunction in a minor dispute before the [*33] matter is submitted to the Railroad Adjustment Board. Of. Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Ry., 353 U.S. 927, 77 S.Ct. 706, 1 L.Ed.2d 722 (1957); Hilbert v. Pennsylvania R.R., 290 E\2d 881 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 900, 82 S.Ct. 174, 7 L.Ed.2d 96 (1961). But inasmuch as the Rutland Railway has submitted the present controversy to the Board, we are n…
  • Hilbert v. Pa. R.R. Co., 290 F.2d 881 (7th Cir. 1961)
    …o the Adjustment Board. The District Court found that either party had a right to submit same, but the plaintiffs sought an injunction thereby avoiding the grievance procedures of the contract and the Act. In Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co., 353 U.S. 927, 77 S.Ct. 706, 1 L.Ed.2d 722, the Court, in a per curiam, opinion, vacated an injunction granted by a state court in a minor dispute because the dispute was not pending before the Adjustment Board. We think the decision in Manion means that a court…

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw