NILVA

v.

UNITED STATES; SENKO V. LACROSSE DREDGING CORP.; RADOVICH V. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE ET AL.; SCHYMAN V. DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION OF ILLINOIS ET AL.; CLARK V. ILLINOIS; FEDERIKA ET AL. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; COOPER V. UNITED STATES; POLIAFICO ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; WOOLFSON V. DOYLE, TRUSTEE, ET AL.; DOPKOWSKI V. RAGEN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Offshore Co. & The Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Johnie M. Robison, 266 F.2d 769 (5th Cir. 1959)
  …in one case was on the bottom of the sea. In other words, under the Jones Act a vessel may mean something more than a means of transport on water. Senko v. La Crosse Dredging Corp., 1957,-352 U.S. 370, 77 S.Ct. 415, 1 L.Ed. 2d 404, rehearing denied 353 U.S. 931, 77 S.Ct. 716, 1 L.Ed.2d 724 resolved some of the doubts the per curiam opinion in Gianfala raised. Senko was a handyman on a dredge. The dredge was anchored to shore and was used as a stationary earth-removing machine. He had applied to his union (…
• Isaacs v. United States, 301 F.2d 706 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …overnment is such that reasonable minds “might differ” then the question becomes one of fact for the jury to resolve, and not one of law to be determined by the courts. See and compare Brennan v. United States, 8 Cir., 240 F. 2d 253, 259, cert. den. 353 U.S. 931, 77 S.Ct. 718, 1 L.Ed. 2d 723; Connelly v. United States, 8 Cir., 249 F. 2d 576, 585, cert. den. 356 U.S. 921, 78 S.Ct. 700, 2 L.Ed.2d 716; Northcraft v. United States, 8 Cir., 271 F. 2d 184, 187. The existence of an overall scheme finds support in…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Herman v. United States, 289 F.2d 362 (5th Cir. 1961)
  …ze that the overt act in support of a conspiracy need not be unlawful itself. It may be a completely innocent act. Poliafico v. United States, 6 Cir., 1956, 237 F. 2d 97, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 1025, 77 S.Ct. 590, 1 L.Ed.2d 597, rehearing denied 353 U.S. 931, 77 S. Ct. 718, 1 L.Ed.2d 725; United States v. Stromberg, D.C.N.Y.1957. 22 F.R.D. 513. Furthermore the verdicts were returned by the same jury after a single trial in which all of the defendants were tried together. Had these been separate and su…