AMITY ESTATES, INC., ET AL.
v.
WERKING

U.S. | 1957-04-22
No. 806
353 U.S. 933 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, cer-tiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Voest-Alpine Int'l Corp. v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 707 F.2d 680 (2d Cir. 1983)
    …ight and an intention to relinquish it. See City of New York v. State of New York, 40 N.Y.2d 659, 669, 389 N.Y.S.2d 332, 357 N.E. 2d 988 (1976); Werking v. Amity Estates, Inc., 2 N.Y.2d 43, 52, 155 N.Y.S.2d 633, 137 N.E. 2d 321 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 933, 77 S.Ct. 812, 1 L.Ed.2d 756 (1957). There is little doubt that Voest sufficiently established Chase’s knowledge of an existing right. Chase clearly had the right to demand strict compliance with the specifications required by the letters of credit,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw