HOLLOMAN

v.

JARNAGIN, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF VETERAN'S APPEALS

Citator

Cited By

• Dirring v. United States, 328 F.2d 512 (1st Cir. 1964)
  …v. United States, 1954, 348 U.S. 121, 139-140, 75 S.Ct. 127, 99 L.Ed. 150; United States v. Woodner, 2 Cir., 1963, 317 F. 2d 649, cert. den. 375 U.S. 903, 84 S.Ct. 903, 11 L.Ed.2d 144, United States v. Allard, 3 Cir., 1957, 240 F. 2d 840, cert. den. 353 U.S. 939, 77 S.Ct. 814, 1 L.Ed.2d 761. We do not agree with the rule of the Fifth Circuit as stated in Strauss v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 311 F. 2d 926. 931-932. The defendant cautions us against “piling inference upon inference.” As interpreted by the…
• United States v. Gallagher, 576 F.2d 1028 (3d Cir. 1978)
  …o the Bank for persons who were not in fact borrowers. With respect to Fredenburgh, it is the law [*1049] that the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the government, United States v. Allard, 240 F. 2d 840 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 939, 77 S.Ct. 814, 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957). Both Slivocka and Brennan testified that they had no knowledge of their “so-called loans.” It follows that the convictions of Fredenburgh on Count XII and Count XVI must be affirmed. The charge to the jury in re…
• United States ex rel. Clinton Burnett v. People OF the State OF Ill., 619 F.2d 668 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …y by the- prosecuting authorities that is a denial of due process of law.” United States ex rel. Williams v. Walker, 535 F. 2d 383, 386-87 & n. 3 (7th Cir.1976) (quoting United States v. Jakalski, 237 F. 2d 503, 504-05 (7th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 939, 77 S.Ct. 817, 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957)) (emphasis added). The petitioner’s original allegations say only that certain testimony against him was perjured. No allegation of knowing use appears. Of course, the absence of such an allegation in the pleading…