UNITED STATES

v.

OLIVER

Citator

Cited By

• City OF Palm BAY v. Bauman, 475 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
  …stion is whether such testing, considered in the light of its scope, nature, incidence and effect, is unreasonable when the immediate end sought is weighed against the private right affected. See, Oliver v. United States, 239 F. 2d 818, Cert. Dismd. 353 U.S. 952, 1 L.Ed.2d 858, 77 S.Ct. 865 (1957). As in McDonnell [sic] [McDon-ell], supra, Palm Bay’s “policy” does not identify the person, or persons, by name or position, who are authorized to require employees to provide a urine sample. The “policy” does no…
• United States v. Costello, 255 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1958)
  …implies that without offense to Constitution or statute writing appearing on the outside of envelopes may be read and used. There seems to be a similar implication in Oliver v. United States, 8 Cir., 239 F. 2d 818, petition for certiorari dismissed 353 U.S. 952, 77 S.Ct. 865, 1 L.Ed.2d 858: certainly that case does not suggest that the law is otherwise. Section 1703(a) penalizes any “Postal Service employee” who “unlawfully detains, delays, or opens any letter * * * which shall come into his possession *…
• Bissonette v. Haig, 800 F.2d 812 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …gency. It is equally true that the presence of statutes and regulations may make unreasonable a search that might otherwise have been perfectly valid under the Fourth Amendment. In Oliver v. United States, 239 F. 2d 818 (8th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 353 U.S. 952, 77 S.Ct. 865, 1 L.Ed.2d 858 (1957), postal authorities opened and searched a package which was tied with twine but not sealed shut. Ex parte Jackson, 6 Otto 727, 96 U.S. 727, 24 L.Ed. 877 (1878), had held, and it remains the law, that warrantless s…