ENTERPRISE INDUSTRIES, INC.,

v.

TEXAS COMPANY

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Exxon Corp. v. Governor OF Maryland, 437 U.S. 117 (U.S. 1978)
  …t the question open in Sun Oil, 371 U. S., at 512 n. 7, and the lower courts have reached conflicting results. Compare Enterprise Industries v. Texas Co., 136 F. Supp. 420 (Conn. 1955), rev’d on other grounds, 240 F. 2d 457 (CA2 1957), cert. denied, 353 U. S. 965, with Bargain Car Wash, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. (Indiana), 466 F. 2d 1163 (CA7 1972). Appellants argue that compliance with the “voluntary allowance” provision may expose them to both primary-line and secondary-line liability under § 2 (a) of the…
• J. Truett Payne Co., Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 451 U.S. 557 (U.S. 1981)
  …es for violation of § 2 (a), that unlawful discrimination in price allowed a favored competitor to draw sales or profits [*570] from him, the unfavored competitor. See Enterprise Industries, Inc. v. Texas Co., 240 F. 2d 457, 458 (CA2), cert. denied, 353 U. S. 965 (1957). Petitioner’s evidence, which the Court concedes to be “weak,” ante, at 565, amounts to nothing more than a showing that its market share declined temporarily 4% in 1972. Petitioner presented no substantial evidence that respondent’s incentiv…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc., 637 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …V, infra. . The district court refused to submit Sweeney’s claim for damages to the jury on the ground that Sweeney failed to establish compensable damages. It relied on Enterprise Indus., Inc. v. Texaco Co., 240 F. 2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 965, 77 S.Ct. 1049, 16 L.Ed.2d 914 (1957). We adopted the analysis of Enterprise in Freedman v. Philadelphia Terminals Auction Co., 301 F. 2d 830, 833-34 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 829, 83 S.Ct. 40, 9 L.Ed.2d 67 (1962). We agree with the distric…