BOWERS

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hughes, 325 F.2d 789 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …h Judge Herlands did make a declaration for the record, he stated, and we agree, that it was not relevant to the primary issues in the hearing. However, defendant argues that under United States v. Halley, 240 F. 2d 418, 419 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 967, 77 S.Ct. 1052, 1 L.Ed.2d 917 (1957) and United States v. Valentino, 283 F. 2d 634 (2d Cir. 1960), Judge Herlands should have disqualified himself when it appeared he might be a witness. But when the hearing started defendant’s counsel was very equi…
• United States v. Smith, 337 F.2d 49 (4th Cir. 1964)
  …s, 307 F. 2d 445, 453 (9 Cir. 1962) (dissenting opinion). In support of his argument to the contrary, Smith relies strongly upon two cases decided by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, United States v. Halley, 240 F. 2d 418, cert. denied, 353 U.S. 967, 77 S.Ct. 1052, 1 L.Ed.2d 917 (1957), and United States v. Valentino, 2 Cir., 283 F. 2d 634 (1960). Neither case is in point. In United States v. Halley, supra, the appellant had filed a motion in the [*54] nature of coram nobis to vacate a judgment…